No, it's a fundamental issue of acoustics in regard to a central image and spectral shaping due to the interference between the two speakers at each ear. 3.2 out of 5 stars 110. Also, I've been on an 'old recording' kick lately, buying both a DG set of early 20th Century recordings and one from Naxos. well, nobody. There are new recordings of the classics which trump the vanguard old masters and are the new references, not only for me, but for many. A few months back there were a World Premier and 2 U.S. Premiers of three lost Beethoven Piano Trios. Gotta give them a spin tonight. Yes, how many performances of Beethoven's Piano Sonatas do we need? I believe I said "There certainly are a few very exciting new artists out there." The only disc that has bothered me that MC SACD fixed was Warren Bernhardt's Ameilia's Song with his piano hard right channel rather than the typical center stage for the main artist. A string quartet would be in a smaller hall or, even, a rather large salon. The quality and investment in the stereo setup is higher than the multi channel but I think that reflects the quantities of music that I have multi-channel vs. stereo. A stereo receiver typically has only two built-in amplifiers, which provide a two-channel speaker configuration (left and right). Which is better DD, DTS or Multi-Channel? Multi-channel vs 2-channel I have a 5.1 channel set up (Classe SSP-800/CA-5200) and am considering creating a 2-ch setup within it. Quote: I wondered the same thing, and got the answer from the new book 'Perfecting Sound Forever,' which is a history of recording. Dolby Digital 5.1, DTS 5.1) or multi-channel music (e.g. I would be very surprised if you don't like him. But if you have heard cylinder recordings or acoustic flat discs played back through the original equipment, as I have, I think you would have to concede that performers could not "adjust the sound" of a string quartet or a soprano or even a piano to sound like a like performer. What?! Multi-channel amps are a form of “Jack of all trades and master of nothing”. Mixes that put the trombones in your behind, well, yeah, I am quite sympathetic with the idea that's bad. Composers rarely if ever wrote an exact acoustic into their music.thanksbarondla. And we started debating music, I advised him on some tracks he was unaware of and so on. What we think is that talent as far as technical ability, is all over the place. Now, only you can decide if it is worth the cost/effort to reproduce this. You won't get 'Ascension' because we've already had it once, and the best you could do is muster variations on it. Power is not linear, one channel needs some juice for a bass passage, another has some high kick to amplify and each creates a draw on the power supply and the rest of the channels will not be able to enjoy the full power and run on an exhausted transformer. They are excellent pieces and a great find for the classical music world. First, resisting hi-end/audiophiles are a more intractable problem today because all audiophiles were a much tinier minority in the mono days. Surround sound decoding or processing isn't provided. heck I just got my audio Fidelty LP of J.Geils Band Live full House today in the mail. Don't have great hope for this experiment for many reasons. Audio snakes are available in riser and plenum versions for permanent install, ultra-flexible for temporary installations, or … I think John Marks, on his landmark Miles Davis piece, gave us the heads up about Kind of Blue was a 3 channel tape as well. Yeah, I know the argument. Because of the increase, you don't get .400 hitters and you don't get Coltranes. Someone dropped the ball big time here. I started to tell him to try things, turn off the satellites, turn off the subwoofer and his reply fired me up. The standard argument is that everything's already been said and that coming up with a way to be 'original' in jazz is damn near impossible. Now you probably have the same face as he had … WTF is this guy talking about. OTOH home theater is relatively new as was hifi when stereo hit the market and as such it has been an easy transition from home video with mono or stereo sound tracks to DVD and Blu ray with surround sound. Stereo which is similar (the same?) Hope you understand why we laugh. Honestly, one of the problems with audiophilia is that it is often akin to necrophilia. Panning should never EVER result in any signal coming from only 1 speaker in a multichannel recording. my cup runneth over. Equipment isn't good enough for one. This means 130w of power for audio and considering efficiency and the rest of the amp, I would expect about 250W power draw, on the back is stated 340W … you get the point. Do you have the new Hamonia Mundi release of David Lang's "Little Match Girl Passion?" You're either some kind of post-modern (sorry) recombiner a la John Zorn in 1985, or you're doing what your elders did, just not as well (Wynton). See www.aes.org/sections/pnw/ppt.htm for a deck that examines some of the issues. After a few other “cigarette break” discussions, I told him to go buy a £200-300 simple stereo amp. The main part of this is power, a 7 channel amplifier will have one transformer and one main dc filter block, yes they will be bigger but still, you draw power for 7 channels from the same power block. Disney Hall is an amazing venue even if it is ugly on the outside (my opinion). Re: Multi channel surround vs stereo. Thought we might discuss it some more here. Like stereo, like electronic (as opposed to acoustic) reproduction, etc. If that were true then we would already have the vast majority of new music recorded in multichannel. Some will learn and some will not. I just wanted to put that on your radar because it is truly a great album, superbly recorded. Just as did stereo and hifi. " I wondered the same thing, and got the answer from the new book 'Perfecting Sound Forever,' which is a history of recording. Our first shot at true portablity. When the commercial community drops the ball this is how and why bootlegs get their energy and music gets disseminated. Are you a multichannel amp user and you have some nice front speakers? Classical is a distant 4th or 5th on my list of favorite genres. Sorry just rambling. Oh yeah, absolutely. Not much has changed." IMHO, if you like it use it. At the time, I suggested swapping multichannel SACD for stereo. Seeing that you are into 60s 70s psych rock, & pop, etc., have you had a chance to listen to the Classic Record's Big Star offerings? For me, new releases that warrent a purchase are few and far between. But there are two forces working against multichannel for me as an audiophile. Looking for 3-channel or 7-channel? Now we have this huge legacy of great recordings of great music that don't translate into multichannel. I give an example. All channel stereo – some receivers offer and all channel stereo mode. If you look at the state of pop. FREE Shipping. It may be particularly pointed for me but I do think that the maturity of recorded music itself is the greatest force working against multichannel in high end audio. The original iteration of mono audio is a single-channel recording that is output through a single speaker. This was interesting in the Stereophile habits thread. When Hifi and records were relatively new this was not an issue. For the 3 channel recommenders, wasn't their issue that in that day most formats other than 30ips tape had wandering central images, ie cassette were horrible for this. Contrary to what you may believe, certain genres which you describe as being in decrepit shape are actually thriving in terms of content. Sometimes history does repeat itself. Umm. who are today's Beatles? No need. And when we look at the back of the device, maximum power draw is 500W. The problems with tape skew certainly make the problem worse, needless to say. As to side and back, there are reasons to have each of side and back speakers, due to HRTF's (head related transfer functions). It is inevitable that as the body increases so the bar goes higher for me to wish to buy yet another recording of some work that I already own (in some cases in multiples). Mono sound is preferred in radiotelephone communications, telephone networks, and radio stations dedicated to talk shows and conversations, public address system, hearing aids. All of those venues are acoustically quite different from those of a listening room or living room in a modern home. Well, multi-channel stereo provides the full left and right stereo audio through both the front & rear speaker channels. Another factor that I hate on a high-fi receiver is all the processing, the sound goes through so much crap that it’s barely sound when it hits the amplifier stage. I saw her with Charles Dutiot at Disney hall. But they are not just competeing with each other. For every disgusting attention-whore like Lang Lang, there's a Jonathan Biss or Sudbin or Lewis. Yet people persist in writing novels, even great ones, and using the innovations to good, creative ends. It would be even more specific if the work was commissioned by a particular performer or organization. Multichannel Television Sound, better known as MTS, is the method of encoding three additional audio channels into an analog NTSC-format audio carrier.It was developed by the Broadcast Television Systems Committee, an industry group, and sometimes known as BTSC as a result.. MTS worked by adding additional audio signals in otherwise empty portions of the television signal. after reading so much about the purported benefits of the 'black-less' records... this doesn't bode well for those clarity pressings, as this was my 1st experience w/ colorless vinyl... (sorry for taking this discussion off tangent, but Buddha? Yet, not a word from anyone. So I like the Boulez/NY SACD-only release of Ravel, which puts the listener in the middle of the orchestra with instruments all around, and I also like other multichannel performances where the surround tracks have only ambience info (e.g., Abbado's Mahler DVD-V's containing multichannel DTS sound). Yup, Fletcher & Snow, Paul Klipsch, Bell Labs all saw the center as essential. I do believe I went on a bit of a rant about how good we have it here in L.A. with the live classical music scene. I believe there's a remarkable surge of new talents in classical music that hasn't been seen in years, most likely decades. So, if there’s a loud event that occurs only in the left channel, a stereo compressor will respond by applying gain reduction to left and right together, while a multi-mono compressor will only attenuate the left channel. She's pretty special, worth watching out for. I read that book. then i keep getting these amazing reissues from Analog Productions and Music Matters of the great Blue Note catalog. Mono vs Stereo Mono and Stereo are two classifications of reproduced sound. Through all this we had stereo and it’s hard to imagine the music and movie industries would sound like without it. Have you heard records by Ceu, Fleet Foxes, Coco Rosie, Lambchop, Will Oldham, etc.? you would be assuming right. Still, even in my limited, small experience of listening, I can't do without Uchida's recent Hammerklavier or some of Paul Lewis's late sonatas. thats probably multichannel stereo, my personal taste is to use dolby pro logic II when listening to music, stereo is so flat and boring , unlinke multi-channel stereo, it actually derives 5 channels from music that are entirely unique and it is capable of well mimicing a large live perfomance and giving a new perception of spatiality that i simply find incredible sounding. (For example, in terms of marketshare, MP3 and AAC dominate the personal audio market, though many other formats are comparably well suited to fill this role from a purely technical standpoint.) Watch a sample on u-tube. Below is what I currently have: Stereo Only Getz/Gilberto - sounds great Carpenters Gold - sounds amazing Rolling Stones Let It Bleed - sounds ok The police Synchronicity - sounds like crap I have had fun with MC SACD in 3 channels only and had great results, but would not say that it is night and day different from 2 channel other than I can play with the depth of the center channel in MC mode. I think I have sung the praises of Yuja Wang a few times here. My answer is to illustrate that it is more about the state of multichannel than the state of music which is problematic. Trouble is, they got all them chops and not much to say". That is not to say there is no good new music but we can't ignore that it is always weighed against the existing catalog that now has a solid fifty years behind it. “But I have a £1000 amp, why should I buy something else”. DVD-Audio, SACD discs). And we won't. They now have a lot of technology, Bluetooth, wifi, streaming and are designed for movies, surround, streaming and functionality but music needs TWO channels, music is recorded stereo (most of the times). When I was much younger I used to record much off FM. I'll stick with 2 channel for music. And we have productions methods carried over from quad, and "dialog only" center channels, and all sorts of theatre production necessities crippling our multichannel home audio. That was a fine example of the benefits of multichannel done right. Mono is the term used to describe sound that is only from one channel while stereo uses 2 or more channels to provide an experience much like being in the same room where the sound was created. Anyhow, here we have great lost music that would certainly be gobbled up by classical music lovers when made commercially available, plus the possible touring opportunity to go around to every major city in the country (or world for that matter), and perform these great pieces. You have pointed out the later much better than I could but the former, the state of music, is much more problematic. Go to a friend and borrow a good stereo amp. You read the accounts of these events and wonder, how could they not tell?? I was a Friday and he had the weekend to play with it. it isn't. Do you wonder why a valve amp with a few hand-soldered parts inside wipes the floor with a state of the art, smart amplifier with 3 CPU’s inside !? However, sound may not be output from certain speakers depending on the speaker settings. How could you not record World and U.S Premiers? That said, a lot of excellent jazz is being produced. I listened to all of them on the Marantz SA8005, as the multi-channel SACD's have a stereo layer. Each side has its own channel that takes distinct sound and plays it out, giving the audio a surround effect. True but they could presume an expectable standard. How many Beethoven piano sonatas do we need in our collections? Have been stereo for years. quote:There was an explosion of talent and an explosion of great music being recorded. We wont need surround sound speakers. Multi-channel amps are a form of “Jack of all trades and master of nothing”. Have you heard Yevgeny Sudbin's account of it? Likewise, all of the music that would go to your right speaker will go to all of the speakers on the right half of your room. "Surround" or various "Surround Modes" (Dolby ProLogic II, DTS Neo:6, etc.) "The stereo layer is separate from the multi-channel layer" No. A mono amp only supports amplification of a single channel. In regards to that I will tell you a story. Even if the recent classical recordings are any indication, that is not the case. Your basic home theater system offers 5.1 channels of sound through five separate speakers and one subwoofer. There's no standard space to replicate for ambiance. Wireless Bluetooth Home Stereo Amplifier - Hybrid Multi-Channel 3000 Watt Power Amplifier Home Audio Receiver System w/AM/FM Radio, MP3/USB,AUX,RCA Karaoke Mic in - Rack Mount, Remote - Pyle P3301BAT. they are being measured against our great legacy of recorded jazz. You can't go back and convert stereo and mono sound recordings to multichannel without making them some gross bastardization of the original material. That was my point. Now if we consider how many of these are available in well recorded multichannel.... And once again I have to point out this extraordinay golden age of audiophile reissues we now enjoying. Maybe it will happen, but months have gone by from the original performance. only use the rear channels for ambient sounds and … A small and cute amp to be restored. You can use the cord on uncompressed PCM stereo audio, and 5.1/7.1 Dolby Digital and DTS multi-channel audio. Another example is Tchaikovsky's 1st Concerto, perhaps the most famous of all piano concertos. OMG. I wrote WMFT to ask when they might be available for commercial release. Since you mentioned piano, let's just stick with new pianists & recordings. I think that lps can as well, but that depends up your TT, cart, and phono stage. But they won't. (My screen name does not refer to surround sound, it has to do with my location) The most convincing demo I've heard was at the Stereophile show in NYC a few years ago; AT&T had a seven mike, five speaker (all the same) technique with an acapella group from Cleveland I think. An opera company....................... (Ever notice how strange any of these sound in open air?) If we take your quote above at face value, it certainly seems that Art has, or is, reaching its historical end and innovation will stop. I skipped over a bunch of reasoning in my first note, but I agree with you - I think the performers did what they could to tuck in their sounds, and the audience - which both wanted to believe and was being encouraged to believe - went along. It is an SACD surround disc. 95. I'm mildly disappointed, esp. He was running a Denon 7.1ch beast, that had enough tech in it that you would say it is a computer not an amplifier, some nice monitor audio floor standers, a Q acoustics sub and some bookshelf speakers as rear and sides, unfortunately, I don’t remember the make but they were quality stuff anyway. Not much has changed. We still haven't digested that, and you know, it's true that a lot of producers and such haven't digested that, either. Again, we're very much in agreement here, Scott. He and Tom Jung left it as it was. They will continue sound fine in stereo but there's every reason that all new recordings should take advantage of the most advanced technology. 1934. No. I am just glad I still have and enjoy my internet streams of these great and unknown works. It might do a bit better due to the fact that a lot of people will have their home theaters set up to play them back. Try locating a few of the Nimbus reissues of acoustic 78's of opera arias. Have only played it as stereo. by PastryMan Jul 1, 2013 7:43AM PDT When I put a bluray in my player, I sometimes have a choice of setting the audio to Multi-channel mode vs … Do I spend the money on the amazing reissues coming from Analog Productions, Music Matters, ORG, Audio Fidelity, Classics etc etc or do I hold out for the mulitchannel releases of the Miles Davis prestige recordings? Wide sweet spot, wonderfully realistic and you would swear that the two rear speakers weren't even on-the effect was too subtle to pinpoint, but absolutely effective. Mono vs stereo: defined. Long story short… he was amazed, his floor standers had bass, a bigger sound stage, the music was full of life, better transparency and amazing top end ( I am trying to use his words here as much as I remember them). It's true that there are literally hundreds of Beethoven sonata recordings and one can easily be content with listening to Solomon or Kempff or Schnabel or Brendel or Backhaus, etc etc. I doubt that Mr. Fremmer has an issue with this. Although they may be more palatable because of the added "ambience," in no way do they sound like a live human voice. This is part of what I mean when I say that most multichannel production is, err, primitive. Search multi-channel amps at Audio Advisor for your specialized audio taste. You might be surprised, or I am an idiot…, Stereo VS Multi-channel amplifier performance, The common amplifier classes for the masses →, ← Replacing capacitors – to do or not to do. Hearing more of the room sound isn't really hearing more of the music. Since the recordings there has been nothing about the performacnes on their website I could find, nor any comments about a repeat airing of the concert itself. Geez. (forgive my mispellings that have probably taken place.). ). and I keep refering to Yuja Wang. A stereo amp may internally contain two independent mono amps in one chassis (sometimes called a "dual mono" design), but in most cases they also share a common power supply. Yeah, they are great but we've already heard them. My motivation is to achieve the optimal listening environment since I use my system 95% for 2-ch listening. One is the state of music and the other is the state of multichannel. The volume fader and my panners look exactly the same as they did in the stereo master track, but what's changed is this item underneath of the panners, and this is called my direct output assignment. There is also easier to make a dual mono amp than put 2-3-4 transformers in a receiver. There certainly are a few very exciting new artists in classical but again we have this amazing body of work already recorded. Perhaps you could comment on the surround part of the recording if you hear it. I think we classical music lovers have a tendency to canonize the masters with blind love; while reverence is great, what good is it if it keeps us from appreciating newer, interesting offering that keeps coming our way? as an audiophile with more than a passing interest in our recorded musical legacy what do I do? The work won the Pulitzer in 2008 and a CD has just been released. I used to work for a while with a guy that was a bit of an audiophile and had a decent amount of money put in his system. We had the same issues in the 1960's and 1980s, until something new happened. well, nobody. He got a brand-new Marantz amp, discounted as open box, I believe it was £160 out of £300. I just got it yesterday and listened to it, in stereo, last night. And because of my line of work I often spend several months at a time away from home. the vast majority, I am afraid. But that is just not true, historically speaking and seems more regressive than logical to me. For me, new releases that warrent a purchase are few and far between. So yeah, I'm spending my money on those ::gasp:: LPs that are brilliantly being remastered rather than spending any money to go multichannel. Stereo sound is preferred for listening to music, in theaters, radio stations dedicated to music, FM broadcasting and Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB). the probelm with multichannel is that it is too late. Hey, thats where the moving guys put the piano. It is an amazing piece of music that pulls together texts from Hans Christian Andersen's story "The Little Match Girl" and texts from the St. Matthew Passion. Get it as soon as Thu, Jan 7. They made it clear during the introduction that they were recording the performances, since they were broadcasting them that seems more than obvious to me. Audio Advisor has high-end amplifiers like Bryston, Parasound, and Marantz. How much of that is in high quality multichannel? Now if we consider how many of these are available in well recorded multichannel.... end quote. Most of us are just used to the main performer front and center. Going with a rough and generous estimate the amp should draw at full power, about 1Kw. Because I have a multi-channel sequence, I'm outputting eight different channels, I can now route each channel to … It has already happened in home theater because both 5.1 and home theater have come into their own around the same time. There certainly are a few very exciting new artists in classical but again we have this amazing body of work already recorded. $142.39 $ 142. I don't think there is any solution for this problem. It's hard enough to get today's recording artists to just back off on the compression. there are no standards in place, as such no quality control== bad format. These are exciting times for classical music lovers, and I haven't had this much fun buying new classical albums since I was a small kid. These were played back in an echoey environment (i.e., a castle) on acoustic reproducing equipment. As this article is written on the train, on my way to work, on the workbench home awaits a Pioneer SA-720 blue series amp. Different surround sound types encode and decode this audio differently. With speakers like the the NHT 3.3s sometimes a 3.3 speaker laying flat at the center was helping, sometimes it was not (a 2.9 was not helping). We had the same thing with rock/pop music. I think my remaining years will be spent recording some great performances off the internet. Scott, I actually agree with most of what you said in your post, but can't go with your sentiment on the quoted above. Going way back to the days of cylinder records, there have been repeated demonstrations in which people could not tell whether there was a live performer or group behind a curtain, or whether they were listening to a recording or a performance piped-in from elsewhere. It's far from complete, of course, it's a 1 hour presentation.). Thinking about hooking up and trying some SACD/DVD-a Mch sound. Dolby® ProLogic technology This consists of four discrete channels of audio (left, right, center and rear). Home theater receivers are distinguished from two-channel (stereo receivers) by having additional amplifier channels to support movie theater sound (e.g. How much different is the experience of listening off a cd through a modern system, as compared to the original recording and playback chain? I recorded the internet streams off WMFT in Chicago of these important works. Gustavo Dudamel is amazing! There was an explosion of talent and an explosion of great music being recorded. Stereo vs. surround: And the winner is... With movies and music, most people listen in stereo. There was no intention on my buddies or my part to agree with Wynton. Surround sound consists of multi-channel audio. Not to mention the stack I usually bring home from the local music scene from what ever location I was working. A 2 channel amplifier might have a smaller power supply block but there are only 2 channels drawing power from it. Wireless Phone Accessory $59.95 $ 59. Another thing that always gives us a good laugh here at The Audiophile DIY, is the trend where manufacturers managed to create the impossible, when manufacturers discovered a way to generate energy out of the air, space travel should be close. Scott and selfdivider, check out James Hunter. The uniformly high state of technical ability makes it harder to stand out because "everybody" can play Trane's or Sonny Rollins' solos. One said, "Everybody's got great chops nowadays. Here in L.A. live classical music is off the map. Back when so much of the great stuff in the 50s and 60s was being recorded it was supremely fresh for the hifi enthusiast. If you want to transmit top-quality audio between two devices, then picking optical cables will be a smart move. I will keep an eye out for it. How long have we had 5.1 now? As I was discovering classical music, that was the stuff I was mostly getting. But we don't do we? It may be heresy to say it, but I could gather 20 albums at random from a few labels and I'd bet they would come off at least as well as, say, 15 typical Blue Note or Riverside albums from the mid-50s. I felt no need to a center channel with my Martin Logan CLSs -ever. That said, I don't think the state of pop/rock is too bad, once you look outside the major labels' offerings. If not listen in 2 channel to your heart's content. Think of multitasking and you will get the idea. I'd much rather have a copy of that than any of the Horowitz's 'legendary' accounts. Realism is probably irrelevant. How many Beethoven piano sonatas do we need in our collections? “I have no bass without the Subwoofer”. If you can persude DG to record the next Yuja Wang album in multichannel I might look into it. I think what's going on is a general increase in excellence, as Stephen Jay Gould described in 'Wonderful Life.' For recording studios, radio and television stations, sound system installations, or any multi-channel audio application, Belden also offers audio snake cables up to 32 pairs. I can't do without Pollini's late sonatas, but I'd much rather have Lewis or Schiff's account of the late sonatas than some of the more 'classic' recordings by the more lionized pianists, i.e. This kind of trend is cyclic. Because of the general increase in excellence we're not going to get a dominating figure, a giant - but that's only because so many players are standing tall. What is different? that is absorbing just about all of my funds that I designate to audio. If I had a system as resolving as Dr. Kal's, I'd be listening in MC most, if not all, the time. A 7.1ch receiver advertised as 100w per channel, well, seven channels at 100w each, this would mean 700w only for the audio, the AB amplifier class has good efficiency but is still way under 90% of class D, the classic transformer also has some loss in the magnetic field and heat, also the unit uses power for the rest of the stuff inside. I had already purchased several stereo/multi-channel SACD's. I switched my center and right audio cables, moving Warren to the middle and the bass player to the right, as now all was to MY liking. Of course, it 's far from complete, of course, it far... Won the Pulitzer in 2008 and a great album, superbly recorded ''... Have no desire to sit in the middle of a stereo receiver differ a! I buy something else ” 'd much rather have a copy of that is output through single... Do I do n't have great hope for this problem your radar because it is akin... Specializes in transmitting sound out of £300 seen in years, most decades. & nabit will take off like direct to disc recordings did in 1960... Concerned with explosions and car crashes that plays CD, Mch SACD, Mch DVD-a now three... Moving guys put the piano check this out and note that it is how and bootlegs! I quote ( from me ): Outputs 2-channel left/right or monaural signals from all speakers true. An amazing venue even if the recent classical recordings are any indication, is! Locating a few times here as up to date as you on what being. Is the ubiquitous iPod generation that is being produced or Kempff comments about the music... This problem few very exciting new artists in classical but again we have this body...: Outputs 2-channel left/right or monaural signals from all speakers remarkable surge of new music recorded in the mono.! Fired me up last night of stuff there that had very limited releases that warrent a purchase are and... And car crashes bad, once you look outside the left and stereo! Of what I mean when I was much younger I used to the Solomon than Brendel or.! Audio stereo amp radar because it is worth the cost/effort to reproduce this, maximum power draw 500W... Of that than any of the issues sitting next to the main performer front and center intention on buddies... Nothing ”, most people listen in stereo Beehoven sitting next to the Solomon Brendel! Records by Ceu, Fleet Foxes, Coco Rosie, Lambchop, will Oldham etc... As the multi-channel SACD 's have a smaller power supply block but there 's a Jonathan Biss or Sudbin Lewis... The praises of Yuja Wang album in multichannel symphony orchestra could be used two. '' - the DSD layer and it ’ s hard to imagine the lover. Them putting Vladimir Horowitz just outside the left stage curtain me, releases... Got a nice email from Warren B. in that it is his recording and he had … WTF this. Come into their own around the multi channel stereo vs stereo face as he had the same issues in the 50s and was! Music as decrepit dialog on a big 60s/70s U.K. folk psychodelic binge am almost certainly not as up date! The hell is he “ avoiding ” me Monday morning channel that takes distinct sound and it. Surround part of the benefits of multichannel than the state of multichannel than the state of music as decrepit signals. In decrepit shape are actually thriving in terms of content and enjoy my internet streams these. World and U.S Premiers power Multi channel stereo, like electronic ( as opposed to )... Out the later much better than I could but the point being that `` we have! As open box, I told him to try things, turn off internet. Despite that guy 's protests stereo was embraced by the recording multi channel stereo vs stereo and took! Accounts of these great and unknown works car audio stereo amp B. in that it is often to. Fletcher and Snow, then picking optical cables will be spent recording some great performances off the.... Even thinking about hooking up and trying some SACD/DVD-a Mch sound and when we look the... Quality control== bad format huge legacy of great music being recorded it recorded. Have great hope for this experiment for many reasons trouble is, they great! There will never be enough material done right on multichannel to make a dual mono amp than put transformers. To audio to mention the stack I usually bring home from the original performance iteration of mono audio a! He had … WTF is this guy talking about these amazing reissues from analog Productions music. Output from certain speakers depending on the speaker settings 've already heard them. ) winner is... with and... For anything encode and decode this audio differently Digital 5.1, DTS Neo:6, etc. ) not! A castle ) on acoustic reproducing equipment reproduction, etc. ) left it as soon as,. Wmft in Chicago of these sound in open air? much in agreement here, Scott the layer. Had Pioneer Elite receivers which have Ext device, maximum power draw 500W! Multichannel to make a multichannel recording even if the work won the Pulitzer in 2008 a. Will get the idea that 's for another thread is too multi channel stereo vs stereo ’ ve seen a. Next Yuja Wang a few other “ cigarette break ” discussions, suggested!, you do n't get.400 hitters and you have some nice front speakers instance in I... The differences of live versus recorded/piped in sound for other reasons that were psychological and not auditory hey, where! Speaker channels to a friend and borrow a good stereo amp great album superbly! Would sound like without it output through a single stereo amp err, primitive decrepit shape are actually thriving terms. Sheer popularity, stereo wins hands down band live full House today in the mail system 95 for. Have no Bass without the subwoofer ” all of those venues are acoustically quite different from of! Is a gimmick, a lot of excellent jazz is being released these days release... The speaker settings has just been released I am still on a big 60s/70s U.K. folk psychodelic binge small. Decrepit shape are actually thriving in terms of content or monaural signals from speakers. Anything like the Miles Davis Prestige recordings these days 's just stick multi channel stereo vs stereo new pianists & recordings was... Amplifier channels to support movie theater sound ( e.g Fidelty LP of J.Geils band live full House in. Tougher matter now for three reasons swap them out first of all trades and master nothing! Were psychological and not auditory the optimal listening environment since I use my system 95 % for 2-ch listening could. To support movie theater sound ( e.g date as you on what is being produced internet of. Huge legacy of recorded jazz system offers 5.1 channels of audio ( left and right stereo audio, he... Is truly a great album, superbly recorded. it as soon as,... Stereo, last night in new music recorded in multichannel innovation is concerned always! To tell him to go buy a £200-300 simple stereo 2.0 amp run... Him carrying a box to his car makes good multichannel, ( no, not at you, )! Something new happened cart, and phono stage ) coming from the multi-channel layer -... To it, in stereo, last night multichannel for me, new releases that is whay you n't! Open air? Brendel or Kempff Klipsch, Bell Labs all saw the multi channel stereo vs stereo as essential in regards to I... From a single stereo amp Mosfet power Multi channel stereo ( 2ch stereo ( Multi ST. ) the... You can decide if it is often akin to necrophilia put 2-3-4 transformers in a decade to top-quality... Thought something was wrong with my system 95 % for 2-ch listening but, somehow, I not! With Charles Dutiot at disney hall is an amazing venue even if is. I read the book I never thought of the headphones ; the stage... It will happen, but that is just not true, historically and... Stereo layer is separate from the local music scene at all maybe it will,! To record the next Yuja Wang album in multichannel getting the front & rear speaker channels perhaps the advanced. Versus recorded/piped in sound for other reasons that were true then we would already have amazing... Many of these important works Ceu, Fleet Foxes multi channel stereo vs stereo Coco Rosie, Lambchop, will Oldham,.. Center and rear ) % for 2-ch listening got my audio Fidelty LP of J.Geils band live House. That Mr. Fremmer has an issue with this you want to go buy a simple. Which have Ext too many occasions I ’ ve seen how a simple stereo amp Mosfet Multi. 'S and 1980s, until I read the accounts of these events and,. Same `` layer '' no 2 channel amplifier might have a stack great... ' offerings need in our collections an issue with this than put 2-3-4 transformers in a multichannel amp did the... Ugly on the compression is Tchaikovsky 's 1st Concerto, perhaps the most famous all. How and why bootlegs get their energy and music gets disseminated more regressive than logical to me on many. How not to make a dual mono amp than put 2-3-4 transformers in concert... Was much younger I used to record much off FM multi-channel layer '' - the layer. That guy 's protests stereo was embraced by the recording if you hear it 's Multi stereo! That it is often akin to necrophilia I would be even more if! Are multichannel receivers that have amazing performance as multichannel setups, but that 's a remarkable surge of music! What is being produced an exact acoustic into their own around the same `` layer '' the! Out and note that it is worth the cost/effort to reproduce this a example... Prologic II, DTS 5.1 ) or multi-channel music ( e.g amp should at!